It seems Jay-Z will have to defend his name in a court of law. A judge has denied his request to dismiss a rape lawsuit against him.

Z’s ongoing rape case took a dramatic turn this week, as the attorney for the woman accusing the music mogul of raping her when she was… The post Judge Allows “Jane Doe” To Proceed Anonymously In Jay-Z’s Rape Lawsuit appeared first on Where Is The Buzz | Breaking News,

Jay-Z’s efforts to dismiss a case accusing him of raping a then-13-year-old girl in 2000 have been denied by a judge, who also granted the “Jane Doe” accuser the ability to proceed anonymously, despite efforts from the rap mogul’s legal team to have her reveal her identity publicly.

Judge Torres has weighed in on Jay-Z v. Tony Buzbee, and it's a win for Buzbee. She's allowing plaintiff to proceed anonymously, at least for now, and she called out Alex Spiro's tactics. "The Court will not fast-track the judicial process merely because counsel demands it." pic.twitter.com/QhdDZ5cKPT

Less than 24 hours after Beyoncé ‘s triumphant Christmas Day NFL halftime extravaganza blew Netflix viewers’ wigs off, a legal storm has hit the Carter household as spouse Jay-Z lost his Hail Mary attempt to terminate the case against him and the incarcerated Sean “Diddy” Combs that allege the duo violently assaulted a minor over 20 years ago.

A New York judge condemned the rapper’s attorney Alex Spiro for his “relentless filing of combative motions containing inflammatory language.”

The judge denied the motion for dismissal on Thursday, as well as a motion to reveal the accuser’s identity; she is currently anonymously known as “Jane Doe.” U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres ruled that Doe is “particularly vulnerable to the possible harms of disclosure” ( per ABC News) and that her identity will remain protected at this “exceedingly early stage in this case.