Air pollution remains a grave threat to human health, but MAHA is doing nothing about it.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on Jan. 9 that it will no longer calculate the economic costs and ...
2don MSNOpinion
EPA’s new way of evaluating pollution rules hands deregulators a sledgehammer and license to ignore public health
When I worked for the Environmental Protection Agency in the 2010s as an Obama administration appointee, I helped write and ...
New Studies Highlight, the Negative Effect of Pollution, on Brain Health. 'The New York Times' reports that working out in polluted air may negate some of the brain benefits provided by exercise. .
This stark reality serves as a reminder of the urgent need for effective air quality regulations. The correlation between reduced air pollution and improved public health is well-documented. A notable ...
The Trump administration is now acting to eliminate even the pretense of concern with impacts on human health. In effect, ...
The agency's new math to favor polluters, explained.
According to the World Health Organization (WHO), approximately 99% of the global population breathes air that exceeds recommended pollution limits, contributing to over 7 million premature deaths ...
The agency is abandoning a longstanding policy to calculate the monetary savings in avoided deaths and disease from cutting certain pollutants.
Ever since Ronald Reagan was president, the Environmental Protection Agency has assigned a value to human life. If you think too long about it, it’s a bit crass, but the upshot was to provide some ...
The Environmental Protection Agency plans on only considering the industrial cost of air pollution, not the human cost, when setting environmental policy.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results